Posts Tagged 'Eco friendly'

Happy Earth Day, Earth

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

Today marks the 40th official year of recognizing the Earth for being, well, the Earth. Check out the certified Earth Day website and see what you can do to help celebrate our cosmically singular yet ubiquitous home.

Unfortunately for our planet, April 22nd will come and go like so many other honorary holidays or birthdays where a calendar day recognizes or memorializes something that is forgotten the next day. If everyone on the planet observed 4/22/2010 with 100% earth-friendly practices, it would not change the Earth’s plight. This is not to say that Earth Day is not important or that it having its own day of recognition is not valuable. It is; it is.

The message just comes with a caveat – Earth Day should be everyday and practiced by everyone in a rational manner. Human behavior is not hard to change for a single day once a year. Most people are incentivized by a mix of peer pressure and conscious that comes with an official Earth Day to think green (but just for today). Instead of going overboard on green-this and eco-that all packed into 24 hours, why not incorporate more sustainable (and attainable) practices in one’s everyday life?

Aside from spurring more people to think about how their everyday actions represent themselves as stewards of a world, hopefully this Earth Day will add fuel to the new climate bill being introduced on April 26th in the U.S. Congress. Because while everyday individual choices do, can, and will make a collective difference, changing our laws in order to move to a more sustainable, more energy-efficient and less oil-dependent world is worth all the carbon free activities one can cram into a late day in April.

Abusus non tollit non nocet – Happy Earth Day, Earth.

Green Washing: Vampire Power ‘lurks’ in ‘eco-friendly, ‘green’ Electronics

Monday, October 26th, 2009

green-question-markWith Halloween just a few days away, many vampire energy loss or vampire power metaphors are being punned by bloggers, columnists and marketers. For instance — “Do Vampires exist? They do in your home electronics“, or “Vampires lurk in your home — beware!“.

It’s expected this time of year. We’ve read countless Count Draculavampire electronics correlations – the most obvious for metaphoric preying.

What we do want to use the Halloween metaphor for is much more important and pretty disconcerting, because we don’t want you tricked into believing something just because of it’s “costume”, or packaging. Green-Washing is when something claims to be eco-friendly or green when it is not. Read the packaging carefully and look for disclaimers about why those costumes are suggesting they are environmentally friendly.

For example – there are new green and eco-friendly products that stake a claim to being the (we’re going there) Van Helsing of their respective electronics, which is awesome if they are what they say they are, but don’t be fooled. The costume is fleeting; what’s underneath is really what counts.

If you are considering purchasing an electronic – anything from a mobile charger to a netbook – look past the green packaging and to the fine print. Important words to look for are “eliminates” and “reduces” and their respective synonyms, because when dealing with vampires – would you rather reduce or eliminate them?

Vampire Labs wishes you an exciting and safe Halloween and simply asks that if you truly want to put a stake in your vampire power consumption, save money and the world, then be careful not to get tricked into buying a mythical green or eco-friendly product. As always, if it says Vampire Proofâ„¢, then rest assured that you are Slaying Vampire Energy Lossâ„¢ .

‘Watt’ to expect from eliminating Vampire Energy Loss?

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Today, more than ever, the consensus on energy is that it needs to be used efficiently, but watt does that mean exactly?

What approach makes the most sense? Should global citizens expect able governments to mandate efficiency standards? Does that mean governments and utilities should come togethergreen-evil-charger-no-vampire-labs to fund and implement smart grid technology on the distribution side? Do manufacturers take the lead to make sure they are supplying the most energy efficient products possible with available technology? Or, do consumers expect their new electronic and appliance products to already be as energy efficient as possible? Or, should global citizens take it upon themselves to use their energy wisely by ensuring they buy the most energy efficient products on the market?

Optimally, a holistic approach that answers ‘Yes’ to all of the above questions is ideal. However, complex problems need to be addressed from all angles.  Where does a nation, or planet, start?

Take South Korea for example, the 26th most populous nation in the world, has made efforts over 2008 and 2009 to reduce vampire energy loss in all electronics and appliances to 1 watt by 2010. Products that do not meet this standard are fashioned with a yellow warning sticker. Their efforts are already beginning to pay off. According to South Korea’s Ministry of Knowledge Economy, “South Korea can expect to save nearly $45 Million worth of energy every year.”

While we strongly believe their target should be 0 watt loss, South Korea’s efforts can provide a tasty sample to the global community of the power our technology offers by addressing vampire energy loss in the most prolific and universal products in the world.

Consider this: the United States ranks 4th in global population; the European Union is 3rd with India and China claiming the top 2 spots. If only 2 of the 4 most populous (and seemingly influential) nations would take a similar approach as South Korea, then BILLIONS in energy savings could begin to be realized, increasing efficiency while ultimately lowering power costs and easing loaded energy budgets.

With widespread adoption of Vampire Proofâ„¢technology on all sides of the energy equation, vast potential exists to execute a holistic approach that sees Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in energy savings, reduces Trillions of Pounds of unnecessary CO2 emissions and offers a rapid return on investment.

“Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Ecomony”

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Read the Executive Summary:

http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/electricpowernaturalgas/downloads/US_energy_efficiency_exc_summary.pdf

Read the Full Report by McKinsey & Co:

http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/electricpowernaturalgas/downloads/US_energy_efficiency_full_report.pdf

U.S. Gov Pushes Energy Efficiency Reform on the heels of Overwhelming Climate Change Impact in the U.S.

Monday, July 27th, 2009

If the effects of climate change in far reaching parts of the world does not spur action, then climate-change-report2maybe its effects on the United States will. It has, at least, struck a nerve within the U.S. government with the recent ACES bill, Energy Efficiency Standards for Appliances, and other energy efficiency measures. The United States Global Change Research Program released Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States, a report that outlines specific detrimental effects to different regions of the U.S. and how important it is to change our environmental course now.

Key findings of the report include:

  1. Global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced.”
  2. Climate changes are underway in the U.S. and are projected to grow.”
  3. Widespread climate-related impacts are occurring now and are expected to increase.”
  4. Climate change will stress water resources.”
  5. Crop and livestock production will be increasingly challenged.”
  6. Coastal areas are at increasing risk from sea-level rise and storm surge.”
  7. Threats to human health will increase.”
  8. Climate change will interact with many social and environmental stresses.”
  9. Thresholds will be crossed, leading to large changes in climate and eco-systems.”
  10. Future climate change and its impacts depend on choices made today.”

Check out how climate change will impact your region in the U.S.:

regional-climate-change-pic-interactive5

Alaska | Islands | Coasts | Northwest | Southwest | Great Plains | Midwest | Northeast | Southeast

The comprehensive report also looks at Climate Change by Sector: 

 

 

climate-change-by-sector-12

Water Resources         Energy Supply & Use           Transportation                 Agriculture

climate-change-by-sector-23

Ecosystems                        Human Health                         Society

 It is no wonder why the U.S. government and Global governing bodies are pushing so hard for energy efficiency measure in order to curb impending climate change. We urge you to take a look at your region and sector and read the report. Our world is changing, and all of our actions will determine if that change will be for better or for worse. 

 

The Answer to Oxfam and the Global Energy Crisis is Reducing Vampire Energy Loss

Friday, July 10th, 2009

plug-electricity4The previous post, Oxfam asks, “What Happened to the Seasons?”,explored the latest climate change report, which captivatingly addresses the personal stories of those suffering. Its overwhelming question of ‘Why?’ arguably has many possible answers; however, a person doesn’t leave the water running when not using it and ask ‘why was the water bill so high?’ or ‘why is there no water left?’. 

While there is a lot of talk surrounding discovering new energy sources, or expanding others – like solar or wind, the first step must be how do we more efficiently use the resources already in place? Likewise, when a new type of energy is discovered, or an existing one is expanded, and that energy is turned into electricity – we still need efficient systems and energy efficient electronic and semiconductor products no matter where the original source of energy comes from.

Take cell phone and mobile device chargers for example, often called ‘wall warts’ – think the little black box that’s plugged into outlets to charge a cell phone. The DOE has noted that wall warts consume about 5% of the electricity used by the average U.S home. This 5% amounts to around 52 Billion kilowatt hours, or the energy produced by 26 average-size power plants! To break it down – the aggregate average U.S. household energy spend for mobile device chargers is $537 Million per month, or almost $6.5 Billion per year, just for mobile device and cell phone chargers! Since most mobile device chargers waste around 80% of the energy they draw, the average total residential dollar amount thrown away on unused, wasted energy is an average $429.6 Million per month, or $5 Billion per year JUST FOR CHARGERS! Think about that, $5 Billion a year on average is wasted due to vampire energy loss that occurs in mobile device chargers in residential homes. Crazy, right? 

suffering-avg-residential-cost12

Of course, chargers are not only used in homes. They are everywhere in our lives, especially at work. The average U.S. commercial operation spends $537 Million per month due to chargers. That is $6.44 Billion annually. As mentioned above, wall warts waste 80% of the energy they pull from the grid; thus, the money thrown away on wasted energy by U.S. commercial operations is $429.67 Million on average per month, or $5.156 Billion annually! 

suffering-avg-commercial-cost2

On top of the residential and commercial energy waste, U.S. industrial operations have an aggregate average monthly energy appetite for mobile device chargers of $237.8 million, or $3.28 Billion per year. The money that is wasted on mobile device chargers’ vampire energy loss is $219 Million per month on average, or $2.628 Billion per year.

suffering-avg-industrial-cost3

Together, all 3 sectors have a total energy waste of a whopping $1.1 Billion per month on average, or $13.7 Billion per year!!!

suffering-avg-aggregate-vel-costs1

It is important to note that most industry experts agree that 5% is a relatively low estimate for commercial and industrial operations, but it is important to Vampire Labs that numbers are not inflated for impact.

It is also necessary to understand that mobile device chargers, or wall warts, are only the tip of the vampire energy loss iceberg. Many other vampire electronics and vampire mechanical devices are present in households and commercial and industrial operations that are not accounted for in the before mentioned data. Those figures only speak to mobile device chargers.

According to John Donovan, an energy efficiency expert and the Editor-in-Chief of Low-Power Design, “Increasing the energy efficiency of chargers by 50% would have a huge impact on energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction.” Vampire Labs aims to eliminate the energy waste altogether, and his next statement especially fuels our fire, “The U.S. electronics industry needs to make a coordinated attack on power consumption, starting with the design of ultra-low power systems” and that “the green future depends on emerging technologies and energy efficient, low power designs.”

Clean Green Machine: Consumers Demand Green

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Technology firms are innovating, consumers are buying, and investors should be paying attention. The model is simple – build it (truly green) and they (consumers) will come. green_globe_260_x_260

Alibaba, a global Internet B2B giant, reported strong growth of keyword searches for words relating to renewable energy and energy efficient products, in addition, they reported that global trade in renewable energy products is rising drastically. In the same report, the global business site reported – 71% increase for green keywords in 2008 compared with 2007, which itself grew 67% from the prior year.

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is also weighing in on consumer Eco-trends and green demand in the May 2009 Home Technology and Energy Efficiency study that concluded consumers are very concerned about their home energy costs and are intent on reducing their monthly bill. Elminating wasted energy is the first major step in any home energy audit. As well, the CEA has released similar findings that green is more than an incentive; it is a must in new electronics and mobile device purchases. 

The findings of a December 2008 CEA study, Going Green: An Examination of the Green Trend and What it Means to Consumers and the CE Industry, uncovered that 33% of consumers expect to make green consumer electronics purchases over the next 2 years. “Consumers are now beginning to associate terms like recycling and energy efficiency with consumer electronics,” said Tim Herbert, CEA’s senior director of market research. “As they seek out those attributes in the purchasing process, there is enormous opportunity for manufacturers and retailers.” The report additionally found that 53% of consumers say they are willing to pay a premium for consumer electronics with green attributes.  photo7

Green Tech has conjointly generated buzz and maintains a large presence in the blogosphere, on twitter and through other popular online communities. Large B2C online retailers, like Amazon and eBay, have joined the growing green opportunity along with large global retailers, like Wal-Mart and Target.

Vampire energy loss is gaining press momentum this year from the Obama Administration, noteworthy news sources - like CNN, the New York Time, LA Times, the DOE, CEA and others.  The world is recognising that vampire energy consumption is severe and must be resolved, especially in consumer electronics. 

The CEA also found a disconnect between existing and emerging energy efficiency measurements and rating systems, like energy star and the voluntary 5 star rating system, because they vary in what measures what, where and at what kilowatt. According to the CEA, consumer confusion surrounds green labels since the consumer electronics industry lacks a holistic green indicator or metric. Likewise, the study says that consumers want an easier way to identify if a product is environmentally sound, and 74% of those consumers think manufacturers and retailers should do more to be Eco-friendly.

The overriding message of these studies is twofold: 1) Consumer demand trends overwhelmingly agree that Eco-friendly technology, electronics and products are a strong existing market that is only forecast to grow exponentially in coming years. 2) OEM manufacturers, retailers (both online and brick and mortar), and investors are presented with a unique opportunity to reap profits as well as be positive environmental stewards. Thus, green is no longer just a cause or mere purchasing incentive; rather, it’s a staunch, rapidly growing consumer and business market.

To be an Eco Charger, or Not to be an Eco Charger: that is the Question

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

On April 1st, 2009, at the Smart Energy Wireless 2009 trade-show in Las Vegas, Nevada, the CTIA-The Wireless Association overwhelmingly adopted the Universal Charger Solution (UCS).

Ironically, on a day infamous for practical jokes – at a convention named Smart Energy – held on behalf of an industry notorious for its negative environmental impact – in a city not recognized for energy conservation, this measure was accepted for 2012 compliance.

As discussed in an earlier post, the UCS is a surprisingly commendable, eco-charger-2254albeit shortsighted, first draft from the mobile wireless industry. It lacks comprehension as it fails to fully address vampire energy loss that occurs in mobile devices. We strongly suggest a revision that forms necessary standards for truly energy efficient Eco chargers.

Research suggests that UCS chargers will only reduce vampire energy by 50%, instead of aiming to eliminate vampire energy consumption altogether. Why not take up front action and manufacture universal chargers with exisisting technology that eliminates wasteful energy loss?

The UCS does bring the right discussion to the table. It’s most Eco-notable quality is the call for a standard micro-USB user interface between a mobile device and its charger. This universal standard will reduce the vast amount of chargers that go into landfills every year, reduce energy that is required to manufacture them, and reduce carbon emissions during shipping.

However, most environmental rewards and positive PR of the UCS are ancillary among the biggest trophy – reduced costs for mobile device manufacturers. The UCS will reduce design, manufacturing, packaging and shipping costs of chargers for mobile device manufacturers.

If an industry’s goal is to provide profitable tech-savvy products and be environmentally revolutionary, then consumers must demand that their electronics actually be energy efficient, instead of only being labeled as such. After all – a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

Duh?!?!?! The Usual Suspects: EPA points to Infamous Greenhouse Gases as Main Culprits of Increasing Climate Change

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

usual-suspects4

 In a new “groundbreaking” report released last week (4/21/09), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fingers carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases (GHG) as direct contributors to climate change, saying that GHG emissions present a serious danger to public health and the environment.  The entire Eco-community was shocked … that it took decades for this report to come from the EPA (ever hear of a little thing called the Kyoto Protocol?).  Regardless, it’s a welcomed sign that the US Government is finally coming to terms with a long overdue reality – the energy party is over.

The EPA’s report focuses on 5 specific GHGs: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).

These harmful GHGs are created  (directly or indirectly) from energy production, like coal power plants, and in the industrial production of numerous everyday products, such as appliances and electronics, and have varying Global Warming Potential (GWP), a metric measuring how much of a given mass of GHG is estimated to adversely contribute to climate change.  GWP’s measure is based upon a comparison between the GHG in question and the same mass of CO2.  ghg21

As the chart displays, the 5 GHGs targeted by the EPA are well known byproducts of power generation and/or byproducts of industrial production, i.e. electricity power plants and the production of consumer electronics.  Also, notice that CO2 has a GWP of 1, even though it’s a very toxic GHG; thus, imagine how damaging the other GHGs are to this planet’s ecology.

We share a complicated relationship with our electronic devices, consumer products and motor vehicles.  While they make our lives easier by solving problems of need, accessibility and convenience, they also create a host of environmental problems that must be addressed, such as motor vehicles emissions and energy consumption of electronics.  Eco batteries, electric cars with Eco battery charging, alternatively fueled vehicles and other Eco friendly ways of charging and powering our technology-dependent lives is crucial to our future and our children’s future.

Maybe this EPA epiphany is the stage in addiction where admitting you have a problem comes many years after the problem is well known?  At the very least, it’s a long awaited signal to the rest of the world that the US is finally ready to confront its unhealthy appetite for GHGs at the proverbial energy buffet.