Posts Tagged 'Standby Energy'

Climate Change requires Business Sector to LEED on Energy Efficiency

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

green-businessmen-shaking-handsWith the UN Climate Conference underway, business leaders now take center stage. A recent New York Times OP-ED, Business Leaders, the Planet Needs You, provided some interesting data on American business and their commitment to environmental responsibility. The author, George Kell is the executive director of the UN Global Compact, a UN initiative aimed at urging businesses to take up socially responsible policies and practices.

According to the Times data, “A study of American companies provides an alarming analysis. Of the largest 1,000 U.S. companies by market cap, only 8.4% have stated environmental policies that address emissions of greenhouse gas.” They do cite regulatory uncertainty as a contributor to the reluctance of businesses to fully commit themselves to environmental responsibilities.

More data suggests that, “A recent analysis of the 300 largest global companies by market capitalization reveals a high level of unmitigated climate change risk.” Kell went further with his analysis.  “Of the companies in this group that have high carbon footprints, 60 percent have not set long-term emissions targets, while 80 percent have not disclosed targets related to the climate impact of their products.”

There is also a feeling that those “entrenched” in carbon heavy industries will not change, but there is hope for industry “fence-sitters”, or those unwilling to commit to or against climate change regulations. Kell lays a framework for convincing the fence-sitters to hop over to the greener side of the debate.

Kell’s framework is outlined below:

1)climate change is the test of business leadership in the 21st century;green-people-arrow1

2. the future of the global marketplace hangs in the balance;

3. addressing climate can trigger an era of sustainable prosperity;

4. transformation is possible and viable; and

5. climate change is an urgent ethical issue for the broader role business in society.”

Kell makes a great point and it is this – businesses drive our economy. If our economy is to become more viable through environmentally sound practices and sustainability, like promoting energy efficiency to thwart climate change and save wasted money and resources, then business leaders MUST work to convince their counterparts that NOW is the time to act responsibly. The benefits are almost always understated: creating a sustainable future for generations to come, saving wasted energy (means saving wasted money), and, most importantly, being leaders for the rest of world.

The Answer to Oxfam and the Global Energy Crisis is Reducing Vampire Energy Loss

Friday, July 10th, 2009

plug-electricity4The previous post, Oxfam asks, “What Happened to the Seasons?”,explored the latest climate change report, which captivatingly addresses the personal stories of those suffering. Its overwhelming question of ‘Why?’ arguably has many possible answers; however, a person doesn’t leave the water running when not using it and ask ‘why was the water bill so high?’ or ‘why is there no water left?’. 

While there is a lot of talk surrounding discovering new energy sources, or expanding others – like solar or wind, the first step must be how do we more efficiently use the resources already in place? Likewise, when a new type of energy is discovered, or an existing one is expanded, and that energy is turned into electricity – we still need efficient systems and energy efficient electronic and semiconductor products no matter where the original source of energy comes from.

Take cell phone and mobile device chargers for example, often called ‘wall warts’ – think the little black box that’s plugged into outlets to charge a cell phone. The DOE has noted that wall warts consume about 5% of the electricity used by the average U.S home. This 5% amounts to around 52 Billion kilowatt hours, or the energy produced by 26 average-size power plants! To break it down – the aggregate average U.S. household energy spend for mobile device chargers is $537 Million per month, or almost $6.5 Billion per year, just for mobile device and cell phone chargers! Since most mobile device chargers waste around 80% of the energy they draw, the average total residential dollar amount thrown away on unused, wasted energy is an average $429.6 Million per month, or $5 Billion per year JUST FOR CHARGERS! Think about that, $5 Billion a year on average is wasted due to vampire energy loss that occurs in mobile device chargers in residential homes. Crazy, right? 

suffering-avg-residential-cost12

Of course, chargers are not only used in homes. They are everywhere in our lives, especially at work. The average U.S. commercial operation spends $537 Million per month due to chargers. That is $6.44 Billion annually. As mentioned above, wall warts waste 80% of the energy they pull from the grid; thus, the money thrown away on wasted energy by U.S. commercial operations is $429.67 Million on average per month, or $5.156 Billion annually! 

suffering-avg-commercial-cost2

On top of the residential and commercial energy waste, U.S. industrial operations have an aggregate average monthly energy appetite for mobile device chargers of $237.8 million, or $3.28 Billion per year. The money that is wasted on mobile device chargers’ vampire energy loss is $219 Million per month on average, or $2.628 Billion per year.

suffering-avg-industrial-cost3

Together, all 3 sectors have a total energy waste of a whopping $1.1 Billion per month on average, or $13.7 Billion per year!!!

suffering-avg-aggregate-vel-costs1

It is important to note that most industry experts agree that 5% is a relatively low estimate for commercial and industrial operations, but it is important to Vampire Labs that numbers are not inflated for impact.

It is also necessary to understand that mobile device chargers, or wall warts, are only the tip of the vampire energy loss iceberg. Many other vampire electronics and vampire mechanical devices are present in households and commercial and industrial operations that are not accounted for in the before mentioned data. Those figures only speak to mobile device chargers.

According to John Donovan, an energy efficiency expert and the Editor-in-Chief of Low-Power Design, “Increasing the energy efficiency of chargers by 50% would have a huge impact on energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction.” Vampire Labs aims to eliminate the energy waste altogether, and his next statement especially fuels our fire, “The U.S. electronics industry needs to make a coordinated attack on power consumption, starting with the design of ultra-low power systems” and that “the green future depends on emerging technologies and energy efficient, low power designs.”

American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 addresses Energy Efficiency for the Future (Part 1)

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Washington DC Presidential InaugurationThe American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES) is making its way through Capitol Hill this week. As most bills in Washington do, ACES is facing a bipartisan battle with opponents claiming high costs for American tax payers and proponents trying to dissuade the bipartisan hype and focus on the benefits of moving toward energy efficiency, reduced greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, smart grid technology and renewable energy.

Moreover, it’s really you look at “savings” and “cost“. If it is immediate benefits and return that one viewpoint seeks as opposed to long-term benefits and savings, the debate can take on many forms. ACES is designed to support American over the long-term and seeks a new direction away from costly and devastating environmental, monetary and unsustainable repercussions of our energy demands.

To clear the record, the Congressional Budget Office, a annual-household-aces3non partisan congressional agency that reviews budget proposals and legislative initiatives in order to understand their monetary implications, has released its findings concerning the immediate costs to US households. As can be seen in the table to the right, the highest associated costs come in at $340 annually while those with the lowest income will actually see a small net benefit.

In addition to these findings, the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy reported that under other ACES initiatives, namely the GHG provisions, US households would actually save around $22 Billion over the same period, or $170 per household. It seems like the costs on one end of ACES are basically covered by the savings on the other end. And these figures do not even address the consumer, construction, electrical, electronic, industrial, thermal, and utility and other savings of energy efficient measures outlined by Title II of ACES.

Part 2 of American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 addresses Energy Efficiency for the Future will examine the energy efficiency benefits that Tittle II of this bill proposes.